In Re Complaint of Judicial Misconduct

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In Re Complaint of Judicial Misconduct. Read the opinion of the Court — 632 F.3d 1289
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided August 13, 2013·No. 13-90073·Published

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

JUDICIAL COUNCIL OF THE NINTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-90073 IN RE COMPLAINT OF JUDICIAL MISCONDUCT ORDER

Filed August 13, 2013

ORDER

KOZINSKI, Chief Judge:

Complainant has filed an Emergency Motion to Stay Proceedings Below captioned as a motion in this misconduct proceeding. The misconduct complaint is pending before me in my administrative capacity as presiding officer of the Judicial Council of the Ninth Circuit. The Judicial Council is not a court and has no authority to interfere with judicial proceedings. In re Complaint of Judicial Misconduct, 630 F.3d 1262 (9th Cir. Jud. Council 2011). Complainant cites 28 U.S.C. § 2106 but that statute only applies to “court(s) of appellate jurisdiction,” which the Judicial Council is not.

The emergency motion is denied. The misconduct complaint is held in abeyance pending resolution of the appellate proceedings in the underlying litigation. See Commentary to Judicial-Conduct Rule 3 (“[C]onsideration and disposition of a complaint under these Rules may be 2 IN RE COMPLAINT OF JUDICIAL MISCONDUCT

properly deferred by a chief judge until appellate proceedings are concluded … .”).

DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Re Complaint of Judicial Misconduct, (9th Cir. 2013).

In Re Complaint of Judicial Misconduct (In Re Complaint of Judicial Misconduct) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Complaint of Judicial Misconduct
630 F.3d 1262 (Ninth Circuit, 2011)