In Re Committee for Effective Cellular Rules
This text of 976 F.2d 45 (In Re Committee for Effective Cellular Rules) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
976 F.2d 45
298 U.S.App.D.C. 97
NOTICE: D.C. Circuit Local Rule 11(c) states that unpublished orders, judgments, and explanatory memoranda may not be cited as precedents, but counsel may refer to unpublished dispositions when the binding or preclusive effect of the disposition, rather than its quality as precedent, is relevant.
In re COMMITTEE FOR EFFECTIVE CELLULAR RULES, Petitioner.
No. 92-1285.
United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.
July 10, 1992.
Before SILBERMAN and RANDOLPH, Circuit Judges.
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Upon consideration of the emergency petition for writ of mandamus, it is
ORDERED that the petition be denied. Petitioner has failed to demonstrate satisfaction of the stringent standards required for injunctive relief, see Virginia Petroleum Jobbers Ass'n v. FPC, 259 F.2d 921, 925 (D.C.Cir.1958), or that its available legal remedy is clearly inadequate. See Reynolds Metals Co. v. FERC, 777 F.2d 760, 762-63 (D.C.Cir.1985); In re GTE Serv. Corp., 762 F.2d 1024, 1026-27 (D.C.Cir.1985).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
976 F.2d 45, 298 U.S. App. D.C. 97, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 35152, 1992 WL 215366, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-committee-for-effective-cellular-rules-cadc-1992.