In re Collins

462 F.2d 538, 59 C.C.P.A. 1170, 174 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 333, 1972 CCPA LEXIS 290
CourtCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals
DecidedJuly 13, 1972
DocketNo. 8713
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 462 F.2d 538 (In re Collins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Customs and Patent Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Collins, 462 F.2d 538, 59 C.C.P.A. 1170, 174 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 333, 1972 CCPA LEXIS 290 (ccpa 1972).

Opinion

Rich, Acting Chief Judge.

This appeal is from the decision of the Patent Office Board of Appeals affirming the rejection of claims 1-5 in appellant’s application serial No. 693,354, filed December 26, 1967, for “Continuous Tube Finned Heat Exchanger.” We affirm.

The Subject Matter Claimed

Appellant’s invention relates to heat exchangers, such as are used, for example, in refrigeration and air conditioning units, formed from continuous, looped metal tubes and a plurality of fins which encompass the- individual tubes completely, giving 360° contact. That is to say, the apertures in the fins are of substantially the size and shape of the tube section. The tubes and fins are in conducting engagement with each other, and, in one form or another, this is a limitation in all of the claims, which are directed to apparatus. Claim 1 (subparagraphing supplied) is illustrative:

1. In a heat exchanger,
a continuous metal tube haying a single wall thickness throughout its length and of sinuous form providing straight portions joined by oppositely presenting loops of said continuous tube, and
metal fins having apertures substantially the shape of the tube section through whieh the straight portions extend in conducting engagement therewith.

All remaining claims depend from claim 1. Claims 2 and 3 specify that the tube is made of aluminum, and claim 4 recites that the tube is “made of a material difficult to solder and braze,” which reads on aluminum. Claims 2-5 all contain various other limitations not relevant to this appeal.

Appellant’s specification states that the claimed heat exchangers may be fabricated by first threading the tube through the openings in a stack of fins, then expanding the tube to engage the apertures of the fins, both in a manner described in certain copending applications referred to in the specification which we are informed 'have [1172]*1172subsequently matured into patents. However, appellant conceded m his brief before.the board that “other methods of construction could be employed,” and, in his request for reconsideration by the board, he explicitly stated that fabrication by such other methods would result in devices which would infringe the claims he seeks here.

Appellant’s Description of .the. Prior Art

According to appellant’s specification;

Heat exchangers * * * have been constructed heretofore by assembling the fins on hairpin type of tube sections the straight portions of which are mechanically expanded to engage spacing collars defining the apertures through the fins. Looped sections of tubing having enlarged ends are placed over the adjacent ends of-spaced pairs of hairpin tube sections and brazed thereto to form a continuous tubular path.

Appellant’s brief before the board illustrated this prior-art construction with the following drawings:

Appellant’s specification then continues:

In another construction, the tube is bent to sinuous iorm with oppositely disposed loops joined by straight portions with the loops on one end extending through elongated, slots in fins which are engaged by the outer half of the straight portions of the tubes. [Emphasis ours.]

This construction was illustrated in appellant’s brief before the board by the following drawings:

[1173]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

George M. Mooney v. Brunswick Corporation
663 F.2d 724 (Seventh Circuit, 1981)
In re Samour
571 F.2d 559 (Customs and Patent Appeals, 1978)
In re Wiggins
488 F.2d 538 (Customs and Patent Appeals, 1973)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
462 F.2d 538, 59 C.C.P.A. 1170, 174 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 333, 1972 CCPA LEXIS 290, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-collins-ccpa-1972.