In re Colker

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Colker

247 A.D. 903

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 15, 1936

StatusPublished

This text of 247 A.D. 903 (In re Colker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Colker, 247 A.D. 903 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).

Pincite

Opinion

Order of the Surrogate’s Court of Kings county adjudging Cathryne Cornell, as administratrix with the will annexed of Emanuel Greene Valverde, deceased, in contempt for having willfully disobeyed a prior order of the court in failing seasonably, as directed, to file a supplemental account; [904]*904and permitting her to purge herself of the contempt by citing all necessary parties and bringing on her accounts for judicial settlement within ten days after the service of a certified copy of the order, otherwise to be committed, affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, payable by appellant personally. If, as is claimed in the brief of appellant, the time given to cite the necessary parties is unreasonable, she may move in the Surrogate’s Court for additional time. No opinion. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Davis, Johnston and Adel, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order of the Surrogate’s Court of Kings county adjudging Cathryne Cornell, as administratrix with the will annexed of Emanuel Greene Valverde, deceased, in contempt for having willfully disobeyed a prior order of the court in failing seasonably, as directed, to file a supplemental account; [904]*904and permitting her to purge herself of the contempt by citing all necessary parties and bringing on her accounts for judicial settlement within ten days after the service of a certified copy of the order, otherwise to be committed, affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, payable by appellant personally. If, as is claimed in the brief of appellant, the time given to cite the necessary parties is unreasonable, she may move in the Surrogate’s Court for additional time. No opinion. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Davis, Johnston and Adel, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

247 A.D. 903, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-colker-nyappdiv-1936.