In re Colker

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Colker

242 A.D. 653, 273 N.Y.S. 371

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 15, 1934·Published

Opinion

Decree of the Surrogate’s Court of Kings county and order entered on reargument unanimously affirmed, with costs to respondent, payable out of the fund directed in the decree to be accounted for in the estate of the husband, Emanuel Green Valverde. We agree with the conclusions reached by the learned surrogate without fully concurring in the reasoning of the opinions. We affirm on the authority of Dunn v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co. (141 App. Div. 478); Matter of Hammer (101 Misc. 351); St. John v. Andrews Institute (191 N. Y. 254, 275). Present — Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty, Scudder and Davis, JJ. [148 Misc. 49, 347.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Decree of the Surrogate’s Court of Kings county and order entered on reargument unanimously affirmed, with costs to respondent, payable out of the fund directed in the decree to be accounted for in the estate of the husband, Emanuel Green Valverde. We agree with the conclusions reached by the learned surrogate without fully concurring in the reasoning of the opinions. We affirm on the authority of Dunn v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co. (141 App. Div. 478); Matter of Hammer (101 Misc. 351); St. John v. Andrews Institute (191 N. Y. 254, 275). Present — Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty, Scudder and Davis, JJ. [148 Misc. 49, 347.]

In re Colker, 242 A.D. 653, 273 N.Y.S. 371 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1934).

Pincite

242 A.D. 653 (In re Colker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related