In Re Coker

692 S.E.2d 892, 387 S.C. 219, 2010 S.C. LEXIS 14
Supreme Court of South Carolina·Decided February 3, 2010·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

The Office of Disciplinary Counsel has filed a petition asking this Court to place respondent on interim suspension pursuant to Rule 17(b), RLDE, Rule 413, SCACR. Respondent consents to the issuance of an order of interim suspension in this matter.

IT IS ORDERED that respondent’s license to practice law in this state is suspended until further order of the Court,

/s/ Jean H. Toal, C.J.

FOR THE COURT

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Re Coker, 692 S.E.2d 892, 387 S.C. 219, 2010 S.C. LEXIS 14 (S.C. 2010).

692 S.E.2d 892 (In Re Coker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Coker
693 S.E.2d 408 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 2010)