In re: Clinton Barlow

710 F. App'x 594
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 6, 2018
Docket17-1397
StatusUnpublished

This text of 710 F. App'x 594 (In re: Clinton Barlow) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re: Clinton Barlow, 710 F. App'x 594 (4th Cir. 2018).

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Clinton C. Barlow, III, petitions for a writ of mandamus relating to his habeas petition filed in the District of New Jersey, as well as a permanent filing injunction imposed on him by that' court. We lack authority to grant mandamus relief in a case over which we would not have appellate jurisdiction. See In re Ojeda Rios, 863 F.2d 202, 204 (2d Cir. 1988); cf. In re Va. Elec. & Power Co., 539 F.2d 357, 365 (4th Cir. 1976) (holding that 28 U.S.C. § 1651 “authorizes this court to issue writs of mandamus to district courts in the circuit”). Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the petition. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Filiberto Ojeda Rios
863 F.2d 202 (Second Circuit, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
710 F. App'x 594, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-clinton-barlow-ca4-2018.