In Re: Cleveland Nelson v.
This text of 559 F. App'x 226 (In Re: Cleveland Nelson v.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Cleveland Nelson petitions for a writ of mandamus, seeking a ruling by the district court on his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion. Although unreasonable delay in the district court may be a reason to grant mandamus relief, see Johnson v. Rogers, 917 F.2d 1283, 1285 (10th Cir.1990), the district court’s docket sheets reflects that the court issued an order on February 4, 2014, granting the motion of the Office of the Public Defender to withdraw from its representation of Nelson and permitting Nelson to proceed pro se. Because there has been recent, significant action in the district court, we conclude that Nelson is not entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, while we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny the petition for a writ of mandamus. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
559 F. App'x 226, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-cleveland-nelson-v-ca4-2014.