In re Clark

809 A.2d 1228, 2002 D.C. App. LEXIS 605, 2002 WL 31477957
District of Columbia Court of Appeals·Decided November 7, 2002·No. No. 01-BG-356·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

In this reciprocal discipline matter, the Board on Professional Responsibility recommends that respondent be suspended from the practice of law in the District of Columbia for ninety days, with reinstatement conditioned upon a showing of fitness.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Clark, 809 A.2d 1228, 2002 D.C. App. LEXIS 605, 2002 WL 31477957 (D.C. 2002).

809 A.2d 1228 (In re Clark) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Bowser
771 A.2d 1002 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2001)
In Re Goldsborough
654 A.2d 1285 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1995)