In re Clark
This text of 809 A.2d 1228 (In re Clark) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District of Columbia Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In this reciprocal discipline matter, the Board on Professional Responsibility recommends that respondent be suspended from the practice of law in the District of Columbia for ninety days, with reinstatement conditioned upon a showing of fitness.
Neither respondent nor Bar Counsel has made exceptions to the Board’s recommendation. Given our limited scope of review in uncontested disciplinary cases, see In re Goldsborough, 654 A.2d 1285, 1287-88 (D.C.1995), we adopt the Board’s recommendation. Accordingly, it is
ORDERED that John L. Clark, Jr. is suspended from the practice of law in the District of Columbia for the period of ninety days, with reinstatement to be conditioned upon a showing of fitness. See D.C. Bar R. XI, § 3(2). The ninety-day period will begin when respondent files an affidavit in compliance with D.C. Bar R. XI, § 14(g), see In re Bowser, 771 A.2d 1002, 1009 (D.C.2001) (per curiam); meanwhile he will remain suspended.
So ordered.
Respondent has been temporarily suspended by this court pursuant to D.C. Bar R. XI, § 11(d).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
809 A.2d 1228, 2002 D.C. App. LEXIS 605, 2002 WL 31477957, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-clark-dc-2002.