In re City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re City of New York

75 A.D.2d 600, 426 N.Y.S.2d 1019, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11043

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 14, 1980

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 75 A.D.2d 600 (In re City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re City of New York, 75 A.D.2d 600, 426 N.Y.S.2d 1019, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11043 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1980).

Pincite

Opinion

In a condemnation proceeding, claimant 7 Horizon Corp. appeals, on the grounds of inadequacy, from so much of the first separate and partial final decree of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered July 13, 1977, as awarded it the sum of $1,463,000 for the subject property. First separate and partial final decree affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs. The decree, insofar as appealed from, was fully supported and justified by the evidence presented and by the applicable principle of valuation (see Levin v State of New York, 13 NY2d 87; Arlen of Nanuet v State of New York, 26 NY2d 346). Special Term properly rejected appellant’s claim of de facto condemnation (see City of Buffalo v Clement Co., 28 NY2d 241). Titone, J. P., Mangano, Rabin and Martuscello, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a condemnation proceeding, claimant 7 Horizon Corp. appeals, on the grounds of inadequacy, from so much of the first separate and partial final decree of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered July 13, 1977, as awarded it the sum of $1,463,000 for the subject property. First separate and partial final decree affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs. The decree, insofar as appealed from, was fully supported and justified by the evidence presented and by the applicable principle of valuation (see Levin v State of New York, 13 NY2d 87; Arlen of Nanuet v State of New York, 26 NY2d 346). Special Term properly rejected appellant’s claim of de facto condemnation (see City of Buffalo v Clement Co., 28 NY2d 241). Titone, J. P., Mangano, Rabin and Martuscello, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

75 A.D.2d 600, 426 N.Y.S.2d 1019, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11043, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-city-of-new-york-nyappdiv-1980.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack