In re City of New York

222 A.D. 686
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In re City of New York. Read the opinion of the Court — 213 A.D. 187

Opinion

Order denying motion to tax disbursements reversed upon the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and proceeding remitted to the Special Term to ascertain, upon proof or by reference, the amount of disbursements incurred by appellant. We are of opinion that the motion was made in time (New York, Ontario & Western R. Co. v. Nelson, 152 App. Div. 245), and that the condemnation proceeding was duly “ taken ” within the meaning of section 992 of the Greater New York Charter. We do not decide the correctness of the bill of alleged disbursements presented by appellant. What has been incurred by it in the course of the condemnation proceeding only, as to which alone it is entitled to reimbursement, is a matter to be determined upon proof. Young, Kapper, Hagarty, Seeger and Carswell, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re City of New York, 222 A.D. 686 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1927).

222 A.D. 686 (In re City of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

New York, Ontario & Western Railway Co. v. Nelson
152 A.D. 245 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1912)