in Re Charles W. Bishop, II

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided January 19, 2012·No. 01-12-00019-CV·Published

Opinion

Opinion issued January 19, 2012

In The

Court of Appeals

For The

First District of Texas

————————————

NO. 01-12-00019-CV

———————————

IN RE CHARLES W. BISHOP, II, Relator

Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relator, Charles W. Bishop, II, has filed a pro se petition for writ of mandamus in this court.  See Tex. Gov’t Code § 22.221 (Vernon 2004); see also Tex. R. App. P. 52.  Relator complains of an order signed by respondent* dismissing two defendants in the trial court.  Relator requests that we order respondent to withdraw the dismissal order and “reinstate” the defendants.

We deny the petition for writ of mandamus.  See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a).

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Higley and Brown.



*           Respondent is The Honorable Reece Rondon of the 234th District Court, Harris County, Texas.  Relator has provided us with information indicating that this original proceeding arises out of Cause No. 201139834, styled Charles W. Bishop, II v. Bruce Robinson et. al, pending in the 234th District Court, Harris County, Texas, the Honorable Reece Rondon, presiding.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

in Re Charles W. Bishop, II, (Tex. Ct. App. 2012).

in Re Charles W. Bishop, II (in Re Charles W. Bishop, II) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.