in Re Charles W. Bishop, II
This text of in Re Charles W. Bishop, II (in Re Charles W. Bishop, II) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion issued January 12, 2012
In The
Court of Appeals
For The
First District of Texas
————————————
NO. 01-12-00002-CV
———————————
IN RE Charles W. Bishop, Relator
Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus
MEMORANDUM OPINION
By petition for writ of mandamus, relator, Charles W. Bishop, asks this Court to compel the trial court to rule and act on a number of motions and other filings.[1]
We deny the petition for writ of mandamus.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Higley and Brown.
[1] The underlying case is Charles W. Bishop v. Bruce Robinson, Flor De Maria Robinson, F.N.U. Robinson, and David Bolton, No. 2011-39834 in the 234th District Court of Harris County, Texas, the Honorable Reece Rondon presiding.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Charles W. Bishop, II, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-charles-w-bishop-ii-texapp-2012.