In Re Cerberus Capital Management, L.P.

161 S.W.3d 531, 2004 Tex. App. LEXIS 11945, 2004 WL 3361985
CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJuly 29, 2004
Docket03-04-00056-CV
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 161 S.W.3d 531 (In Re Cerberus Capital Management, L.P.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re Cerberus Capital Management, L.P., 161 S.W.3d 531, 2004 Tex. App. LEXIS 11945, 2004 WL 3361985 (Tex. Ct. App. 2004).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PEMBERTON, Justice.

Relators filed a petition for writ of mandamus asking this Court to reverse the trial court’s disqualification of relators’ counsel. See Tex.R.App. P. 52. Mandamus is an extraordinary remedy, available only when a trial court clearly abuses its discretion and when there is no adequate remedy on appeal. In re Ford Motor Co., 988 S.W.2d 714, 718 (Tex.1998). Applying this exacting standard to the briefing, argument, and record, we must deny relators’ petition for writ of mandamus. See Tex.R.App. P. 52.8(a).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
161 S.W.3d 531, 2004 Tex. App. LEXIS 11945, 2004 WL 3361985, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-cerberus-capital-management-lp-texapp-2004.