In Re: Carole Ann Wilson, Ward
This text of In Re: Carole Ann Wilson, Ward (In Re: Carole Ann Wilson, Ward) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA,____________________ February 06, 2025
The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:
A25A0903. IN RE: CAROLE ANN WILSON, WARD.
In this guardianship action, the probate court appointed Matthew Wilson as the emergency guardian and conservator of his elderly mother, Carole Ann Wilson. Samantha Wilson, Carole Ann’s daughter, subsequently filed a motion to set aside the guardianship order under OCGA § 9-11-60 (d) (3). The probate court denied Samantha’s motion and she filed this direct appeal. We lack jurisdiction. An appeal from an order denying a motion to set aside a judgment under OCGA § 9-11-60 (d) must be made by application for discretionary appeal. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (8); Jim Ellis Atlanta, Inc. v. Adamson, 283 Ga. App. 116, 116 (640 SE2d 688) (2006). “Compliance with the discretionary appeals procedure is jurisdictional.” Smoak v. Dept. of Human Resources, 221 Ga. App. 257, 257 (471 SE2d 60) (1996). Samantha Wilson’s failure to file a discretionary application deprives this Court of jurisdiction over this appeal, which is hereby DISMISSED.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ 02/06/2025 I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.
, Clerk.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
In Re: Carole Ann Wilson, Ward, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-carole-ann-wilson-ward-gactapp-2025.