in Re Carl Deaton
This text of in Re Carl Deaton (in Re Carl Deaton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas June 13, 2014
No. 04-14-00411-CR
IN RE Carl DEATON
Original Mandamus Proceeding 1
ORDER
Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice
On June 11, 2014, relator filed a pro se petition for writ of mandamus. The court has considered relator’s petition and is of the opinion that relator is not entitled to mandamus relief. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is DENIED. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a). Relator’s motion to waive the requirement that he provide this court with multiple copies of his petition for writ of mandamus is DENIED AS MOOT. The court’s opinion will issue at a later date.
It is so ORDERED on June 13th, 2014.
_____________________________ Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 13th day of June, 2014.
_____________________________ Keith E. Hottle Clerk of Court
1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2010CR11883, styled The State of Texas v. Carl Deaton, pending in the 379th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Ron Rangel presiding.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Carl Deaton, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-carl-deaton-texapp-2014.