In re Cantelmo

278 A.D. 800
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 8, 1951
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 278 A.D. 800 (In re Cantelmo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Cantelmo, 278 A.D. 800 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1951).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

In the dissolution proceeding of the corporation, Brewer-Cantelmo Co., Inc., instituted on the ground of deadlock under section 103 of the General Corporation Law by Edward C. Cantelmo, the owner of 50% of the stock of the corporation, and resisted by James A. Brewer, the owner of the remaining 50% of the corporate stock, the court had no power to fix the fees of attorneys who were retained by Brewer, the 50% stockholder, to resist the dissolution. This is so even though, as here, the order dissolving the corporation and appointing a receiver was held improper and reversed and the dissolution proceeding thus terminated. (Matter of Cantelmo [Brewer], 275 App. Div. 231.) The attorneys’ recourse is against Brewer, the party who retained them (Matter of Stoll-Meyer Woodcrafters, 84 N. Y. S. 2d 757).

The order providing for a reference upon an application by respondents seeking an allowance for legal services rendered in opposing the dissolution proceeding should accordingly be reversed and the motion in all respects denied.

Peck, P. J., Dore, Cohn, Van Yoorhis and McCurn, JJ., concur.

Order unanimously reversed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the appellant, and the motion denied. [See post, p. 941.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Feldmeier v. Feldmeier Equip., Inc.
2018 NY Slip Op 5893 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2018)
Boucher v. Carriage House Realty Corp.
105 A.D.3d 951 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)
Ehlinger v. Hauser
2010 WI 54 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 2010)
In re the Dissolution of Penepent Corp.
198 A.D.2d 782 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)
In re the Dissolution of Public Relations Aids, Inc.
109 A.D.2d 502 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)
In re Reinschreiber
70 A.D.2d 596 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1979)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
278 A.D. 800, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-cantelmo-nyappdiv-1951.