In re Candee, Smith & Howland Co.
159 N.Y.S. 230, 173 A.D. 962
Opinion
The order appealed from is affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements, on the ground that no leave to sue is necessary. Pierce v. Wilson, 118 App. Div. 662, 103 N. Y. Supp. 678; Vitelli v. May, 120 App. Div. 448, 104 N. Y. Supp. 1082. Order filed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re Candee, Smith & Howland Co., 159 N.Y.S. 230, 173 A.D. 962 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1916).
159 N.Y.S. 230 (In re Candee, Smith & Howland Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Pierce v. Wilson
118 A.D. 662 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1907)
Vitelli v. May
120 A.D. 448 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1907)