Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/In re Candee, Smith & Howland Co.

In re Candee, Smith & Howland Co.

173 A.D. 962
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 15, 1916·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam: The

order appealed from is affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, on the ground that no leave to sue is necessary. (Pierce, Butler &Pierce Mfg. Co. v. Wilson, 118 App. Div. 662; Vitelli v. May, 120 id. 448.) Present—Clarke, P. J., Scott, Dowling, Smith and Page, JJ. Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Candee, Smith & Howland Co., 173 A.D. 962 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1916).

173 A.D. 962 (In re Candee, Smith & Howland Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pierce v. Wilson
118 A.D. 662 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1907)