Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/In re Candee, Smith & Howland Co.

In re Candee, Smith & Howland Co.

173 A.D. 962
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 15, 1916
StatusPublished

This text of 173 A.D. 962 (In re Candee, Smith & Howland Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Candee, Smith & Howland Co., 173 A.D. 962 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1916).

Opinion

Per Curiam: The

order appealed from is affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, on the ground that no leave to sue is necessary. (Pierce, Butler &Pierce Mfg. Co. v. Wilson, 118 App. Div. 662; Vitelli v. May, 120 id. 448.) Present—Clarke, P. J., Scott, Dowling, Smith and Page, JJ. Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Pierce v. Wilson
118 A.D. 662 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1907)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
173 A.D. 962, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-candee-smith-howland-co-nyappdiv-1916.