In re Cameron

92 A.D.3d 1201, 938 N.Y.2d 822
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 23, 2012
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 92 A.D.3d 1201 (In re Cameron) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Cameron, 92 A.D.3d 1201, 938 N.Y.2d 822 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2012).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Peters, JR, Lahtinen, Spain, Malone Jr. and Stein, JJ, concur. Ordered that petitioner’s motion is granted; and it is further ordered that respondent is suspended from the practice of law for an indefinite period, effective immediately, and until further order of this Court; and it is further ordered that, for the period of suspension, respondent is commanded to desist and refrain from the practice of law in any form, either as principal or as agent, clerk or employee of another; and respondent is hereby forbidden to appear as an attorney or counselor-at-law before any court, judge, justice, board, commission or other public authority, or to give to another an opinion as to the law or its application, or any advice in relation thereto; and it is further [1202]*1202ordered that respondent shall comply with the provisions of this Court’s rules regulating the conduct of suspended attorneys (see 22 NYCRR 806.9).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Cameron
100 A.D.3d 1142 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
92 A.D.3d 1201, 938 N.Y.2d 822, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-cameron-nyappdiv-2012.