In re Caldwell

649 N.E.2d 279, 72 Ohio St. 3d 1520
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In re Caldwell. Read the opinion of the Court — 76 Ohio St. 3d 156
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided May 17, 1995·No. 95-718; Nos. 94APF07-996 and 94APF07-997·Published

Opinion

On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists; the parties are to brief the following issue stated in the court of appeals’ Journal Entry, filed March 28,1995: “For the reasons in the memorandum decision of this court rendered herein on March 23,1995, it is the order of this court that the motion to certify the judgment of this court as being in conflict with the judgments of the Court of Appeals for Cuyahoga County in In re Samkas (1992), 80 Ohio App.3d 240, 608 N.E.2d 1172, and In re Bremmer (Apr. 1, 1993), Cuyahoga App. No. 62088, unreported, is sustained, and, pursuant to Section 3(B)(4), Article IV, Ohio Constitution, the record of this case is certified to the Supreme Court of Ohio for review and final determination upon the following issue in conflict: On the question of whether or not juvenile courts have jurisdiction to impose consecutive commitment orders to the Ohio Department of Youth Services.”

Wright and F.E. Sweeney, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Caldwell, 649 N.E.2d 279, 72 Ohio St. 3d 1520 (Ohio 1995).

649 N.E.2d 279 (In re Caldwell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Samkas
608 N.E.2d 1172 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1992)