In re Caldwell

Ohio Supreme Court

In re Caldwell

649 N.E.2d 279, 72 Ohio St. 3d 1520

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedMay 17, 1995

Docket95-718; Nos. 94APF07-996 and 94APF07-997

StatusPublished

This text of 649 N.E.2d 279 (In re Caldwell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Caldwell, 649 N.E.2d 279, 72 Ohio St. 3d 1520 (Ohio 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists; the parties are to brief the following issue stated in the court of appeals’ Journal Entry, filed March 28,1995: “For the reasons in the memorandum decision of this court rendered herein on March 23,1995, it is the order of this court that the motion to certify the judgment of this court as being in conflict with the judgments of the Court of Appeals for Cuyahoga County in In re Samkas (1992), 80 Ohio App.3d 240, 608 N.E.2d 1172, and In re Bremmer (Apr. 1, 1993), Cuyahoga App. No. 62088, unreported, is sustained, and, pursuant to Section 3(B)(4), Article IV, Ohio Constitution, the record of this case is certified to the Supreme Court of Ohio for review and final determination upon the following issue in conflict: On the question of whether or not juvenile courts have jurisdiction to impose consecutive commitment orders to the Ohio Department of Youth Services.”

Wright and F.E. Sweeney, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists; the parties are to brief the following issue stated in the court of appeals’ Journal Entry, filed March 28,1995: “For the reasons in the memorandum decision of this court rendered herein on March 23,1995, it is the order of this court that the motion to certify the judgment of this court as being in conflict with the judgments of the Court of Appeals for Cuyahoga County in In re Samkas (1992), 80 Ohio App.3d 240, 608 N.E.2d 1172, and In re Bremmer (Apr. 1, 1993), Cuyahoga App. No. 62088, unreported, is sustained, and, pursuant to Section 3(B)(4), Article IV, Ohio Constitution, the record of this case is certified to the Supreme Court of Ohio for review and final determination upon the following issue in conflict: On the question of whether or not juvenile courts have jurisdiction to impose consecutive commitment orders to the Ohio Department of Youth Services.”

Wright and F.E. Sweeney, JJ., dissent.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

649 N.E.2d 279, 72 Ohio St. 3d 1520, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-caldwell-ohio-1995.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack