In Re Burris

California Supreme Court

In Re Burris

81 P. 1077, 147 Cal. 370, 1905 Cal. LEXIS 405

CourtCalifornia Supreme Court

DecidedJuly 29, 1905

DocketNo. 21,036.

StatusPublished

Cited by7 cases

This text of 81 P. 1077 (In Re Burris) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In Re Burris, 81 P. 1077, 147 Cal. 370, 1905 Cal. LEXIS 405 (Cal. 1905).

Pincite

Opinion

THE COURT.

This is a petition for the modification of ' an order of disbarment heretofore entered against the petitioner.

The order was made more than ten years ago upon a charge. of professional misconduct involving no criminality, and no serious wrong to any one, though inexcusable in itself. Since, that time, as we learn from the testimonials accompanying the petition, the petitioner has been living, a life of probity, industry, and sobriety. These testimonials are signed by a number of judges of the superior court, and by many prominent attorneys of the counties where the petitioner was engaged in practice prior to the order of disbarment. His restoration to the bar is also recommended by the judge in whose court the matter was pending, out of which the charge of misconduct arose.

In view of this strong testimony in his favor, we are of *371 the opinion that the petitioner is entitled to the modification which he asks.

It is therefore ordered that the said John F. Burris be and he is hereby restored as an attorney and counselor of this court, and that his name be reinstated upon the roll of attorneys thereof.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

THE COURT.

This is a petition for the modification of ' an order of disbarment heretofore entered against the petitioner.

The order was made more than ten years ago upon a charge. of professional misconduct involving no criminality, and no serious wrong to any one, though inexcusable in itself. Since, that time, as we learn from the testimonials accompanying the petition, the petitioner has been living, a life of probity, industry, and sobriety. These testimonials are signed by a number of judges of the superior court, and by many prominent attorneys of the counties where the petitioner was engaged in practice prior to the order of disbarment. His restoration to the bar is also recommended by the judge in whose court the matter was pending, out of which the charge of misconduct arose.

In view of this strong testimony in his favor, we are of *371 the opinion that the petitioner is entitled to the modification which he asks.

It is therefore ordered that the said John F. Burris be and he is hereby restored as an attorney and counselor of this court, and that his name be reinstated upon the roll of attorneys thereof.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

81 P. 1077, 147 Cal. 370, 1905 Cal. LEXIS 405, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-burris-cal-1905.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack