In re Burks

470 F. App'x 195
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 29, 2012·No. No. 11-1997·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

James K. Burks, Jr., petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006) motion. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. Our review of the district court’s docket reveals that the district court entered an order on January 27, 2012, denying Burks’ motion. Accordingly, because the district court has recently decided Burks’ case, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented [196] in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Burks, 470 F. App'x 195 (4th Cir. 2012).

470 F. App'x 195 (In re Burks) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related