In Re Bryant L Woods v. the State of Texas

CourtTexas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)
DecidedJanuary 22, 2026
Docket01-26-00071-CR
StatusPublished

This text of In Re Bryant L Woods v. the State of Texas (In Re Bryant L Woods v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston) primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re Bryant L Woods v. the State of Texas, (Tex. Ct. App. 2026).

Opinion

Opinion issued January 22, 2026

In The

Court of Appeals For The

First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-26-00071-CR ——————————— IN RE BRYANT L. WOODS, Relator

Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relator Bryant L. Woods, incarcerated and proceeding pro se, has filed an

application for a writ of habeas corpus in this Court.1 See TEX. GOV’T CODE

§ 22.221; see also TEX. R. APP. P. 52. In his petition, relator asks this court to

discharge him from custody or to alternatively reduce his bail.

1 The underlying case is State of Texas v. Bryant L. Woods, cause number 1777024, pending in the 262nd District Court of Harris County, Texas, the Honorable Lori Chambers Gray presiding. The courts of appeal have no original habeas-corpus jurisdiction in criminal

matters. In re Ayers, 515 S.W.3d 356, 356 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2016,

orig. proceeding) (citing TEX. GOV’T CODE § 22.221(d)). Original jurisdiction to

grant a writ of habeas corpus in a criminal case is vested in the Texas Court of

Criminal Appeals, the district courts, the county courts, or a judge in those courts.

Id. (citing TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 11.05). Therefore, this court does not have

original habeas corpus jurisdiction over relator’s complaints. See id.; Ortiz v. State,

299 S.W.3d 930, 932 (Tex. App.—Amarillo 2009, orig. proceeding) (holding court

of appeals did not have jurisdiction in original proceeding to consider challenge to

denial of bail and dismissing petition for writ of habeas corpus).

Accordingly, relator’s petition is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Adams and Justices Gunn and Johnson.

Do not publish. See TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ortiz v. State
299 S.W.3d 930 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2009)
in Re Avery Lamarr Ayers
515 S.W.3d 356 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2016)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
In Re Bryant L Woods v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-bryant-l-woods-v-the-state-of-texas-txctapp1-2026.