Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/In re Brush

In re Brush

247 A.D. 760
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 15, 1936
StatusPublished

This text of 247 A.D. 760 (In re Brush) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Brush, 247 A.D. 760 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).

Opinion

In a proceeding in Surrogate’s Court, Kings county, on a final accounting by the executrix which involved the interpretation of certain paragraphs of the will and the validity of an in terrorem provision, decree, in so far as an appeal is taken therefrom, unanimously affirmed, with costs to respondent, payable out of the estate. We are of opinion that in this case there was a gift over to persons definitely named as entitled to the residue. (See Matter of Vandevort, 62 Hun, 612; Matter of Arrowsmith, 162 App. Div. 623; affd., 213 N. Y. 704; Hogan v. Curtin, 88 id. 162.) Present — Young, Carswell, Davis, Adel and Taylor, JJ. [154 Misc. 480.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re the Accounting of Arrowsmith
108 N.E. 1089 (New York Court of Appeals, 1915)
In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of Proceedings of Arrowsmith
162 A.D. 623 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1914)
In re Vandervort's Estate
17 N.Y.S. 316 (New York Supreme Court, 1892)
In re the Estate of Brush
154 Misc. 480 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1935)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
247 A.D. 760, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-brush-nyappdiv-1936.