In Re Bruckshaw
24 A.3d 860
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedJuly 14, 2011
Docket724 EAL 2010
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 24 A.3d 860 (In Re Bruckshaw) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
In Re Bruckshaw, 24 A.3d 860 (Pa. 2011).
Opinion
ORDER
AND NOW, this 14th day of July 2011, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED LIMITED to the following issue. The issue, as stated by petitioner, is:
Whether a court is empowered to remove a principal juror without any reason and without any notice to the parties, and replace her with the last possible alternate, again without any notice to the parties, after all evidence was submitted and the jury had already retired to deliberate?
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Bruckshaw v. Frankford Hospital of the Philadelphia
58 A.3d 102 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2012)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
24 A.3d 860, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-bruckshaw-pa-2011.