In re Bruckshaw
24 A.3d 860, 611 Pa. 275, 2011 Pa. LEXIS 1563
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided July 14, 2011·No. Appeal, No. 724 EAL 2010·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
ORDER
AND NOW, this 14th day of July 2011, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED LIMITED to the following issue. The issue, as stated by petitioner, is:
Whether a court is empowered to remove a principal juror without any reason and without any notice to the parties, and replace her with the last possible alternate, again without any notice to the parties, after all evidence was submitted and the jury had already retired to deliberate?
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re Bruckshaw, 24 A.3d 860, 611 Pa. 275, 2011 Pa. LEXIS 1563 (Pa. 2011).
24 A.3d 860 (In re Bruckshaw) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Bruckshaw v. Frankford Hospital of the Philadelphia
58 A.3d 102 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2012)
In Re Bruckshaw
24 A.3d 860 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2011)