In re Brown

42 P.2d 680, 5 Cal. App. 2d 218, 1935 Cal. App. LEXIS 1044
California Court of Appeal·Decided March 11, 1935·No. Crim. No. 2694·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

THE COURT.

The petitioner is remanded to custody. It is the opinion of this court that the order of the superior court admitting the petitioner to probation for a period of three years after his plea of guilty of violation of section 112 of the California Vehicle Act, and providing as a condition of such probation that defendant serve at the county road camp during the first two years of said probationary period, was an order made within the authority of the court. The condition thus imposed does not violate any provision of section 19a of the Penal Code. See, also, section 1203 of the Penal Code, and particularly that para[219] graph thereof defining the court’s power over punishment in connection with orders admitting to probation. There is nothing in section 112 of the California Vehicle Act which limits or changes the power of the court as above stated.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Brown, 42 P.2d 680, 5 Cal. App. 2d 218, 1935 Cal. App. LEXIS 1044 (Cal. Ct. App. 1935).

42 P.2d 680 (In re Brown) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Rojas
216 Cal. App. 2d 819 (California Court of Appeal, 1963)
In Re Brown
5 Cal. App. 2d 218 (California Court of Appeal, 1935)