In re Brooklyn Bar Ass'n
243 A.D. 703
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 15, 1935·Published
Opinion
Proceeding dismissed. Unless the respondent is more attentive to his financial obligations to his clients and ceases to commingle outside business with those obligations, he will soon find himself facing serious disciplinary charges. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty, Carswell and Tompkins, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re Brooklyn Bar Ass'n, 243 A.D. 703 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1935).
243 A.D. 703 (In re Brooklyn Bar Ass'n) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.