Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/In re Brooklyn Bar Ass'n

In re Brooklyn Bar Ass'n

237 A.D. 898
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In re Brooklyn Bar Ass'n. Read the opinion of the Court — 229 A.D. 654 →
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 15, 1933·Published

Opinion

The respondent is in error when he states there was no consideration for the guaranty. His frivolous attitude might justify the inference that he signed the guaranty without intending to meet its obligations. This would be conduct which would subject him to discipline. Since he has seen the light and paid the claim, the proceeding is dismissed. Present—Young, Kapper, Hagarty, Tompkins and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Brooklyn Bar Ass'n, 237 A.D. 898 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1933).

237 A.D. 898 (In re Brooklyn Bar Ass'n) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.