Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/In re Brooklyn Bar Ass'n

In re Brooklyn Bar Ass'n

230 A.D. 846
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In re Brooklyn Bar Ass'n. Read the opinion of the Court — 223 A.D. 149 →
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 15, 1930·Published

Opinion

Motion to confirm report of official referee granted, respondent disbarred and his name ordered stricken from the roll of attorneys. The respondent has eoneededly, at least three times, converted the money of clients. Restitution after complaint made, in this case, does not excuse or ameliorate the wrong. Present •—■ Lazansky, P. J., Rich, Hagarty, Carswell and Tompkins, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Brooklyn Bar Ass'n, 230 A.D. 846 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1930).

230 A.D. 846 (In re Brooklyn Bar Ass'n) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.