In Re Bridwell

474 P.2d 116, 25 Utah 2d 1, 1970 Utah LEXIS 532
CourtUtah Supreme Court
DecidedAugust 31, 1970
Docket11546
StatusPublished
Cited by22 cases

This text of 474 P.2d 116 (In Re Bridwell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Utah Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re Bridwell, 474 P.2d 116, 25 Utah 2d 1, 1970 Utah LEXIS 532 (Utah 1970).

Opinions

PER CURIAM

(with two Justices dissenting) :

Pursuant to a disciplinary proceeding, the Utah State Bar recommended that George E. Bridwell, an attorney, be disbarred from the further practice of law in this State. This matter is before us for a determination of what penalty, if any, should be imposed upon the attorney.

It has been the policy of this court to look upon the findings and recommendations of the Utah State Bar with indulgence;1 and while we are still of the opinion that the findings of the Utah State Bar should be adopted by this court unless they appear to be arbitrary or not in accord with the preponderance of the evidence, yet we do not consider the recommendations of punishment made by the Bar to be in the same category as we do their findings of fact, because it is our responsibility to discipline an erring attorney, and we cannot delegate that duty to others. The Utah State Bar makes its recommendations upon a reading of the printed record of proceedings had before committees and not before the individual commissioners of the State Bar. We are, therefore, in an equally good position to evaluate the situation as are the commissioners.

We have carefully considered the evidence given before the investigating committee and considered the length of time which had elapsed between the alleged misconduct and the conclusion of the hearing and are of the opinion that a suspension of one year from the practice of law would be an adequate amount of punishment to be imposed upon Mr. Bridwell, together with a requirement that he pay to the Utah State Bar the actual costs incurred in connection with the disciplinary proceedings.

It is, therefore, ordered that George E. Bridwell be suspended from the practice of law in this State for a period of one year from the issuance of the remittitur, and that in addition thereto he be required to reimburse the Utah State Bar for the actual expenses incurred in connection with this disciplinary proceeding.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Johnson v. Department of Transportation
2004 UT App 284 (Court of Appeals of Utah, 2004)
In Re Worthen
926 P.2d 853 (Utah Supreme Court, 1996)
Salt Lake City v. Ohms
881 P.2d 844 (Utah Supreme Court, 1994)
Holm v. Smilowitz
840 P.2d 157 (Court of Appeals of Utah, 1992)
In Re Knowlton
800 P.2d 806 (Utah Supreme Court, 1990)
In re Admission of Thorne
635 P.2d 22 (Utah Supreme Court, 1981)
In Re Judd
629 P.2d 435 (Utah Supreme Court, 1981)
In Re Hansen Disciplinary Proceeding
586 P.2d 413 (Utah Supreme Court, 1978)
In Re Hansen
584 P.2d 805 (Utah Supreme Court, 1978)
The Florida Bar v. McCain
361 So. 2d 700 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1978)
In Re Badger
493 P.2d 1273 (Utah Supreme Court, 1972)
In Re Bridwell
474 P.2d 116 (Utah Supreme Court, 1970)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
474 P.2d 116, 25 Utah 2d 1, 1970 Utah LEXIS 532, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-bridwell-utah-1970.