In Re Boyd

711 S.E.2d 898, 393 S.C. 159, 2011 S.C. LEXIS 206
Supreme Court of South Carolina·Decided June 14, 2011·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

ORDER

Respondent was suspended on August 9, 2010, for a period of six months. He has now filed an affidavit requesting reinstatement pursuant to Rule 32, of the Rules for Lawyer Disciplinary Enforcement contained in Rule 413, SCACR.

The request is granted and he is hereby reinstated to the practice of law in this state.

/s/Jean H. Toal, Chief Justice

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Re Boyd, 711 S.E.2d 898, 393 S.C. 159, 2011 S.C. LEXIS 206 (S.C. 2011).

711 S.E.2d 898 (In Re Boyd) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re Boyd
731 S.E.2d 876 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 2012)