In re Boston Opera Co.

249 F. 271, 1918 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1132
CourtDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts
DecidedJanuary 26, 1918
DocketNo. 22206
StatusPublished

This text of 249 F. 271 (In re Boston Opera Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Massachusetts primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Boston Opera Co., 249 F. 271, 1918 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1132 (D. Mass. 1918).

Opinion

HALE, District Judge.

This case comes before the court on the decision of the referee, disallowing the claim of Edwardo FerrariFontana. This creditor was an Italian singer, who made a contract with the Boston Opera Company to sing for the season of 1914-15. His contract with that company contains this clause:

[272]*272“XV. It is agreed that, in case the theater should he destroyed by the elements, the company shall not be held to give the performances. The artist, in this case, is not entitled to any salary nor indemnity. The company will take steps to have the performances resumed as soon as possible. Moreover, the company has the right to terminate the contract in case of fire or the destruction of the theater, in case of war, in case of epidemics, or the closing of the theater by the authorities. But such a step can only be taken In regard to the entire personnel.”

Under this clause the Opera Company could terminate its contract “in case of war.” The learned counsel for the claimant contends, however, that the contract could not be canceled in case of a war in which Italy was not engaged and in which America was not engaged. The same line of reasoning "is applied as in the Smith Case (D. C.) 249 Fed. 269, just decided. I think this case, now before me, presents even a stronger case of justification on the part of the Opera Company to terminate its contract. I must hold, as I did in the Smith Case, that the great world war affected the opera season, and was a contingency beyond the control of the contracting parties; that it changed the Opera Company’s position in reference to the performance of its contract, and put a burden on it greater than the parties contemplated when the contract was made. Thaddeus Davids Co. v. Hoffman-La Roche Chemical Works, 97 Misc. Rep. 33, 160 N. Y. Supp. 973, Davis v. Columbia Coal Mining Co., 170 Mass. 391, 49 N. E. 629.

Order of the referee affirmed; claim of Edwardo Ferrari-Fontana disallowed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Thaddeus Davids Co. v. Hoffman-La Roche Chemical Works
97 Misc. 33 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1916)
Davis v. Columbia Coal Mining Co.
49 N.E. 629 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1898)
In re Boston Opera Co.
249 F. 269 (D. Massachusetts, 1918)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
249 F. 271, 1918 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1132, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-boston-opera-co-mad-1918.