In re: Blue Cross Blue Shield Antitrust Litigation
This text of In re: Blue Cross Blue Shield Antitrust Litigation (In re: Blue Cross Blue Shield Antitrust Litigation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, N.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL on . MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION
IN RE: BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD ANTITRUST LITIGATION : MDL No. 2406
(SEE ATTACHED SCHEDULE)
CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO —48)
On December 12, 2012, the Panel transferred 2 civil action(s) to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407. See 908 F.Supp.2d 1373 (J.P.M.L. 2012). Since that time, 84 additional action(s) have been transferred to the Northern District of Alabama. With the consent of that court, all such actions have been assigned to the Honorable R. David Proctor. It appears that the action(s) on this conditional transfer order involve questions of fact that are common to the actions previously transferred to the Northern District of Alabama and assigned to Judge Proctor. Pursuant □□□ Rule 7.1 of the Rules of Procedure-of the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, the action(s) on the attached schedule are transferred under 28 U.S.C. § 1407 to the Northern District of Alabama for the reasons stated in the order of December 12, 2012, and, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable R. David Proctor. This order does not become effective until it is filed in the Office of the Clerk of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama. The transmittal of this order to said Clerk shall be stayed 7 days from the entry thereof. If any party files a notice of opposition with the Clerk of the Panel within this 7-day period, the stay will be continued until further order of the Panel.
pending atthis tine, the FOR THE PANEL: stay Is lifted. . Sep 16, 2025 VY Augcll cere Srares mene Son James V. Ingold Clerk of the Panel
eS NOH CLERK" - STED CSTATES!-DISTRCT con le ha AOU Onn DEPUTY, CLERK’ we “Ay her ge ee WX —
IN RE: BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD ANTITRUST LITIGATION MDL No. 2406.
. SCHEDULE CTO-48 - TAG-ALONG ACTIONS
CALIFORNIA NORTHERN
. Memorial Hospital for Cancer and Allied Diseases et al v, CAN 3 2907066 Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Ilinois et al
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
In re: Blue Cross Blue Shield Antitrust Litigation, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-blue-cross-blue-shield-antitrust-litigation-cand-2025.