In re Bishop

Supreme Court of Louisiana

In re Bishop

605 So. 2d 1137, 1992 La. LEXIS 3083, 1992 WL 296900

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In re Bishop. Read the opinion of the Court — 1991 La. LEXIS 2882 →

Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided October 16, 1992·No. No. 92-B-2493·Published

Opinion

DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS

PER CURIAM.

Upon review of the findings and recommendations of the Hearing Committee and of the Disciplinary Board, and of the record filed herein, it is the decision of the court that the Disciplinary Board’s recommendation be adopted.

Accordingly, it is ordered that the name of L. DANIEL BISHOP be stricken from the roll of attorneys and that his license to practice law in Louisiana be revoked and cancelled. Costs of the proceedings are assessed to respondent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS

PER CURIAM.

Upon review of the findings and recommendations of the Hearing Committee and of the Disciplinary Board, and of the record filed herein, it is the decision of the court that the Disciplinary Board’s recommendation be adopted.

Accordingly, it is ordered that the name of L. DANIEL BISHOP be stricken from the roll of attorneys and that his license to practice law in Louisiana be revoked and cancelled. Costs of the proceedings are assessed to respondent.

In re Bishop, 605 So. 2d 1137, 1992 La. LEXIS 3083, 1992 WL 296900 (La. 1992).

Pincite

605 So. 2d 1137 (In re Bishop) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.