In re Bishop

588 So. 2d 376, 1991 La. LEXIS 2882, 1991 WL 218446
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided October 24, 1991·No. No. 91-B-1597·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDING

PER CURIAM.

Upon review of the findings and recommendations of Hearing Committee 5 and of the Disciplinary Board, and upon consideration of the evidence and of the briefs of the parties and of the record and oral argument, it is the decision of the Court that the Disciplinary Board’s recommendations be adopted.

Accordingly, it is ordered that L. Daniel Bishop, Jr. be suspended from the practice of law in Louisiana for a period of three years from the finality of this decision. It is further ordered that respondent make full restitution in the amount of $3,847.99, together with legal interest from the date of his receipt of the client’s funds until paid. Respondent’s payment of full restitution or efforts to make restitution will be considered if respondent applies for readmission. All costs of this proceeding are assessed to respondent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Bishop, 588 So. 2d 376, 1991 La. LEXIS 2882, 1991 WL 218446 (La. 1991).

588 So. 2d 376 (In re Bishop) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Champagne v. Celotex Corp.
599 So. 2d 1086 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1992)
In Re Huddleston
595 So. 2d 1141 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1992)
Cole v. Celotex Corp.
588 So. 2d 376 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1992)
Champagne v. Celotex Corp.
588 So. 2d 391 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1991)