In re Bell

824 S.E.2d 216, 425 S.C. 572
Supreme Court of South Carolina·Decided February 20, 2019·No. Appellate Case No. 2018-000941·Published

Opinion

By opinion dated December 20, 2017, this Court suspended petitioner from the practice of law for nine months, retroactive to the date of his interim suspension. In re Bell , 421 S.C. 520 , 809 S.E.2d 54 (2017). 1 Petitioner filed a petition for reinstatement pursuant to Rule 33, RLDE, Rule 413, SCACR. After referral to the Committee on Character and Fitness (the Committee), the Committee has filed a report and recommendation recommending the Court reinstate petitioner to the practice of law. We find petitioner has met the requirements of Rule 33(f), RLDE, Rule 413, SCACR. Accordingly, we grant the petition for reinstatement.

/s/ Donald W. Beatty , C.J.

/s/ John W. Kittredge , J.

/s/ Kaye G. Hearn , J.

/s/ John Cannon Few , J.

/s/ George C. James, Jr. , J.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Bell, 824 S.E.2d 216, 425 S.C. 572 (S.C. 2019).

824 S.E.2d 216 (In re Bell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In the Matter of James L. Bell
809 S.E.2d 54 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 2017)
In re Bell
793 S.E.2d 314 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 2016)