In re Bell

Supreme Court of South Carolina

In re Bell

793 S.E.2d 314, 418 S.C. 398, 2016 S.C. LEXIS 379

CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina

DecidedNovember 18, 2016

DocketAppellate Case No. 2016-002328

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 793 S.E.2d 314 (In re Bell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Bell, 793 S.E.2d 314, 418 S.C. 398, 2016 S.C. LEXIS 379 (S.C. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

The Office of Disciplinary Counsel asks this Court to place respondent on interim suspension pursuant to Rule 17 of the Rules for Lawyer Disciplinary Enforcement (RLDE) contained in Rule 413 of the South Carolina Appellate Court Rules (SCACR).

[399]*399IT IS ORDERED that respondent’s license to practice law in this state is suspended until further order of this Court.

Respondent is hereby enjoined from taking any action regarding any trust, escrow, operating, and any other law office account(s) respondent may maintain at any bank or other financial institution, including, but not limited to, making any withdrawal or transfer, or writing any check or other instrument on the account(s).

s/Costa M. Pleicones, C.J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI