In re Bell

Supreme Court of South Carolina

In re Bell

793 S.E.2d 314, 418 S.C. 398, 2016 S.C. LEXIS 379

Supreme Court of South Carolina·Decided November 18, 2016·No. Appellate Case No. 2016-002328·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

The Office of Disciplinary Counsel asks this Court to place respondent on interim suspension pursuant to Rule 17 of the Rules for Lawyer Disciplinary Enforcement (RLDE) contained in Rule 413 of the South Carolina Appellate Court Rules (SCACR).

[399] IT IS ORDERED that respondent’s license to practice law in this state is suspended until further order of this Court.

Respondent is hereby enjoined from taking any action regarding any trust, escrow, operating, and any other law office account(s) respondent may maintain at any bank or other financial institution, including, but not limited to, making any withdrawal or transfer, or writing any check or other instrument on the account(s).

s/Costa M. Pleicones, C.J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

The Office of Disciplinary Counsel asks this Court to place respondent on interim suspension pursuant to Rule 17 of the Rules for Lawyer Disciplinary Enforcement (RLDE) contained in Rule 413 of the South Carolina Appellate Court Rules (SCACR).

[399] IT IS ORDERED that respondent’s license to practice law in this state is suspended until further order of this Court.

Respondent is hereby enjoined from taking any action regarding any trust, escrow, operating, and any other law office account(s) respondent may maintain at any bank or other financial institution, including, but not limited to, making any withdrawal or transfer, or writing any check or other instrument on the account(s).

s/Costa M. Pleicones, C.J.

In re Bell, 793 S.E.2d 314, 418 S.C. 398, 2016 S.C. LEXIS 379 (S.C. 2016).

Pincite

793 S.E.2d 314 (In re Bell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related