in Re B.C.

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in in Re B.C.. Read the opinion of the Court — 579 S.W.3d 432
Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided December 3, 2020·No. 14-20-00784-CV·Published

Opinion

Order filed December 3, 2020

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals ____________

NO. 14-20-00784-CV ____________

IN RE B.C., Relator

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS On Appeal from the 300th District Court Brazoria County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 93456-F

ORDER

On November 18, 2020, relator B.C. filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this court. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221; see also Tex. R. App. P. 52.

Relator’s petition does not comply with the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.3(j) (“The person filing the petition must certify that he or she has reviewed the petition and concluded that every factual statement in the petition is supported by competent evidence included in the appendix or record.”); 52.7(a)(2) (“Relator must file with the petition . . . a properly authenticated transcript of any relevant testimony from any underlying proceeding, including any exhibits offered in evidence, or a statement that no testimony was adduced in connection with the matter complained.”). By this order, the court gives relator ten days’ notice that the petition will be dismissed for failure to comply with Rules 52.3(j) and 52.7(a)(2) unless the deficiency is cured. See generally Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c).

PER CURIAM

Panel Consists of Justices Bourliot, Zimmerer, and Spain.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

in Re B.C., (Tex. Ct. App. 2020).

in Re B.C. (in Re B.C.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.