In re B.C.

3 N.E.3d 1223, 138 Ohio St. 3d 1423
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In re B.C.. Read the opinion of the Court — 137 Ohio St. 3d 1473
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided February 27, 2014·No. 2013-1932·Published

Opinion

Clark App. No. 2013-CA-72. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal involving the termination of parental rights from the Court of Appeals for Clark County.

Upon consideration of appellant’s motion to consolidate the case with Supreme Court case No. 2014- 0181, In re B.C., it is ordered by the court that the motion is granted and that the briefing in case Nos. 2013-1932 and 2014-0181 shall be consolidated. Appellant’s brief shall be filed within 20 days from the date of the entry pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. 16.02(A)(1). The parties shall file two originals of each of the briefs permitted under S.Ct.Prac.R. 16.02 through 16.04 and include both case [1424] numbers on the cover page of the briefs. The parties shall otherwise comply with the requirements of S.Ct.Prac.R. 16.01 through 16.04.

O’Donnell, Lanzinger, and Kennedy, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re B.C., 3 N.E.3d 1223, 138 Ohio St. 3d 1423 (Ohio 2014).

3 N.E.3d 1223 (In re B.C.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.