In re B.C.
This text of 999 N.E.2d 703 (In re B.C.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Clark App. No. 2013-CA-72. This cause is pending before the court as a jurisdictional appeal involving termination of parental rights.
Upon consideration of appellant’s motion for leave to redact personally identifying information, it is ordered by the court that the motion is granted. Counsel for appellant shall come to the Supreme Court of Ohio Clerk’s Office -within ten days of the date of this entry and redact the information identified in her motion.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
999 N.E.2d 703, 137 Ohio St. 3d 1451, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-bc-ohio-2013.