In re B.C.

Ohio Supreme Court

In re B.C.

999 N.E.2d 703, 137 Ohio St. 3d 1451

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In re B.C.. Read the opinion of the Court — 137 Ohio St. 3d 1473 →

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided December 30, 2013·No. 2013-1932·Published

Opinion

Clark App. No. 2013-CA-72. This cause is pending before the court as a jurisdictional appeal involving termination of parental rights.

Upon consideration of appellant’s motion for leave to redact personally identifying information, it is ordered by the court that the motion is granted. Counsel for appellant shall come to the Supreme Court of Ohio Clerk’s Office -within ten days of the date of this entry and redact the information identified in her motion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Clark App. No. 2013-CA-72. This cause is pending before the court as a jurisdictional appeal involving termination of parental rights.

Upon consideration of appellant’s motion for leave to redact personally identifying information, it is ordered by the court that the motion is granted. Counsel for appellant shall come to the Supreme Court of Ohio Clerk’s Office -within ten days of the date of this entry and redact the information identified in her motion.

In re B.C., 999 N.E.2d 703, 137 Ohio St. 3d 1451 (Ohio 2013).

Pincite

999 N.E.2d 703 (In re B.C.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.