In Re Baxter

Washington Supreme Court

In Re Baxter

160 P.2d 1022, 23 Wash. 2d 935

CourtWashington Supreme Court

DecidedApril 27, 1945

DocketNo. 29459.

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 160 P.2d 1022 (In Re Baxter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Washington Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In Re Baxter, 160 P.2d 1022, 23 Wash. 2d 935 (Wash. 1945).

Pincite

Opinions

¹ Reported in 158 P.2d 330; 160 P.2d 1022. This proceeding is a companion one to In re Jullin, ante p. 1, 158 P.2d 319.

The facts in the present proceeding are substantially the same as those in the Jullin case, except that the claimant Baxter quit his employment with St. Paul Tacoma Lumber Company on May 31, 1943, by reason of a labor dispute; that he filed his claim for unemployment compensation benefits on the following day, June 1, 1943; and that he returned to work with that company three days later, on June 4, 1943. We commented, in the Jullin case, upon these distinguishing factors. The legal questions involved in the instant appeal are virtually the same as those in the former case.

Upon the authority of the Jullin case, and for yet stronger reason, the judgment of the superior court in the instant proceeding is affirmed.

BEALS, C.J., MILLARD, ROBINSON, SIMPSON, and JEFFERS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

¹ Reported in 158 P.2d 330; 160 P.2d 1022. This proceeding is a companion one to In re Jullin, ante p. 1, 158 P.2d 319.

The facts in the present proceeding are substantially the same as those in the Jullin case, except that the claimant Baxter quit his employment with St. Paul Tacoma Lumber Company on May 31, 1943, by reason of a labor dispute; that he filed his claim for unemployment compensation benefits on the following day, June 1, 1943; and that he returned to work with that company three days later, on June 4, 1943. We commented, in the Jullin case, upon these distinguishing factors. The legal questions involved in the instant appeal are virtually the same as those in the former case.

Upon the authority of the Jullin case, and for yet stronger reason, the judgment of the superior court in the instant proceeding is affirmed.

BEALS, C.J., MILLARD, ROBINSON, SIMPSON, and JEFFERS, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

160 P.2d 1022, 23 Wash. 2d 935, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-baxter-wash-1945.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack