Home/Court of Appeals of Texas/In Re Bank One, N.A.

In Re Bank One, N.A.

215 S.W.3d 912, 2006 Tex. App. LEXIS 629, 2006 WL 176972
Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided January 25, 2006·No. 2-06-022-CV·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinions

MEMORANDUM OPINION1

PER CURIAM.

The court has considered relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and emergency motion for stay and is of the opinion that relief should be denied. Accordingly, relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and emergency motion for stay are denied.

Relator shall pay all costs of this original proceeding, for which let execution issue.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Re Bank One, N.A., 215 S.W.3d 912, 2006 Tex. App. LEXIS 629, 2006 WL 176972 (Tex. Ct. App. 2006).

215 S.W.3d 912 (In Re Bank One, N.A.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Bank One, N.A.
216 S.W.3d 825 (Texas Supreme Court, 2007)
In Re Bank One, N.A.
215 S.W.3d 912 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2006)