In Re Bank One, N.A.
215 S.W.3d 912, 2006 Tex. App. LEXIS 629, 2006 WL 176972
CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJanuary 25, 2006
Docket2-06-022-CV
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases
This text of 215 S.W.3d 912 (In Re Bank One, N.A.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
In Re Bank One, N.A., 215 S.W.3d 912, 2006 Tex. App. LEXIS 629, 2006 WL 176972 (Tex. Ct. App. 2006).
Opinions
MEMORANDUM OPINION1
The court has considered relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and emergency motion for stay and is of the opinion that relief should be denied. Accordingly, relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and emergency motion for stay are denied.
Relator shall pay all costs of this original proceeding, for which let execution issue.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
In Re Bank One, N.A.
216 S.W.3d 825 (Texas Supreme Court, 2007)
In Re Bank One, N.A.
215 S.W.3d 912 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2006)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
215 S.W.3d 912, 2006 Tex. App. LEXIS 629, 2006 WL 176972, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-bank-one-na-texapp-2006.