In re Bakalik
30 A.D.3d 1114, 815 N.Y.S.2d 836
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 9, 2006·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Order of disbarment entered. Memorandum: Respondent’s unexcused failure to appear or answer the petition constitutes a default (see Matter of Termini, 28 AD3d 1256 [2006]; Matter of Hensel, 24 AD3d 1324 [2005]). Present—Pigott, Jr., PJ., Hurlbutt, Kehoe, Martoche and Smith, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re Bakalik, 30 A.D.3d 1114, 815 N.Y.S.2d 836 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2006).
30 A.D.3d 1114 (In re Bakalik) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In re Bakalik
30 A.D.3d 1113 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)