In Re B & W Management, Inc. Debtors. J.W. Kaempfer, Jr. v. Philip J. Brown

925 F.2d 487, 288 U.S. App. D.C. 256, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 18157, 1991 WL 18494
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit·Decided January 4, 1991·No. 90-7027·Unpublished·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

925 F.2d 487

288 U.S.App.D.C. 256

Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: D.C. Circuit Local Rule 11(c) states that unpublished orders, judgments, and explanatory memoranda may not be cited as precedents, but counsel may refer to unpublished dispositions when the binding or preclusive effect of the disposition, rather than its quality as precedent, is relevant.
In re B & W MANAGEMENT, INC., et al. Debtors.
J.W. KAEMPFER, Jr., et al.
v.
Philip J. BROWN, et al., Appellants.

No. 90-7027.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

Jan. 4, 1991.

D.C.D.C., 721 F.Supp. 1361

Before MIKVA, STEPHEN F. WILLIAMS, and CLARENCE THOMAS, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the motions for summary affirmance, the response thereto, and the reply, it is

ORDERED that the motions for summary affirmance be granted. The merits of the parties' positions are so clear as to justify summary action. See Taxpayers Watchdog, Inc. v. Stanley, 819 F.2d 294, 297 (D.C.Cir.1987) (per curiam); Walker v. Washington, 624 F.2d 541, 545 (D.C.Cir.) (per curiam), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 994 (1980).

The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after disposition of any timely petition for rehearing. See D.C.Cir.Rule 15.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Re B & W Management, Inc. Debtors. J.W. Kaempfer, Jr. v. Philip J. Brown, 925 F.2d 487, 288 U.S. App. D.C. 256, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 18157, 1991 WL 18494 (D.C. Cir. 1991).

925 F.2d 487 (In Re B & W Management, Inc. Debtors. J.W. Kaempfer, Jr. v. Philip J. Brown) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related