In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a
283 A.D.2d 335, 727 N.Y.S.2d 617, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6445
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a. Read the opinion of the Court — 247 A.D.2d 158 →
Opinion
—Motion granted and respondent reinstated as an attorney and counselor-at-law in the State of New York, effective the date hereof. No opinion. Concur — Naredelli, J. P., Williams, Mazzarelli, Ellerin and Saxe, JJ. [See, 240 AD2d 106.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a, 283 A.D.2d 335, 727 N.Y.S.2d 617, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6445 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).
283 A.D.2d 335 (In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In re of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a
240 A.D.2d 106 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)