In Re Assessment of Benefits

Supreme Court of Minnesota

In Re Assessment of Benefits

209 N.W. 632, 167 Minn. 525

CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota

DecidedJune 11, 1926

DocketNo. 25,225.

StatusPublished

This text of 209 N.W. 632 (In Re Assessment of Benefits) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In Re Assessment of Benefits, 209 N.W. 632, 167 Minn. 525 (Mich. 1926).

Pincite

Opinion

¹ Reported in 209 N.W. 632. Appeal by certain objectors from a judgment of the district court of Ramsey county confirming assessments for street improvements. The case was here on appeal from an order denying their motion for a new trial and is reported in 164 Minn. 31,204 N.W. 558.

So far as the questions now presented were before the court on the former appeal from the order denying a new trial, the decision on that appeal is the law of the case. There is no call for reconsideration. The appellants refer to a few matters which were not specifically discussed in the former opinion though they were not overlooked. We have considered all the matters presented by the assignments of error and all the contentions of appellants and in our view the judgment is without error.

Judgment affirmed.

*Page 1

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

¹ Reported in 209 N.W. 632. Appeal by certain objectors from a judgment of the district court of Ramsey county confirming assessments for street improvements. The case was here on appeal from an order denying their motion for a new trial and is reported in 164 Minn. 31,204 N.W. 558.

So far as the questions now presented were before the court on the former appeal from the order denying a new trial, the decision on that appeal is the law of the case. There is no call for reconsideration. The appellants refer to a few matters which were not specifically discussed in the former opinion though they were not overlooked. We have considered all the matters presented by the assignments of error and all the contentions of appellants and in our view the judgment is without error.

Judgment affirmed.

*Page 1

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

209 N.W. 632, 167 Minn. 525, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-assessment-of-benefits-minn-1926.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack