In re Assessment of Benefits from Changing Grade, Grading, Paving & Improving of Robert

Supreme Court of Minnesota

In re Assessment of Benefits from Changing Grade, Grading, Paving & Improving of Robert

209 N.W. 632, 167 Minn. 525, 1926 Minn. LEXIS 1377

CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota

DecidedJune 11, 1926

DocketNo. 26,225

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 209 N.W. 632 (In re Assessment of Benefits from Changing Grade, Grading, Paving & Improving of Robert) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Assessment of Benefits from Changing Grade, Grading, Paving & Improving of Robert, 209 N.W. 632, 167 Minn. 525, 1926 Minn. LEXIS 1377 (Mich. 1926).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appeal by certain objectors from a judgment of the district court of Ramsey county confirming assessments for street improvements. The ease was here on appeal from an order denying their motion for a new trial and is reported in 164 Minn. 31, 204 N. W. 558.

So far as the questions now presented were before the court on the former appeal from the order denying a new trial, the decision on that appeal is the law of the case. There is no call for reconsideration. The appellants refer to a few matters which were not specifically discussed in the former opinion though they were not overlooked. We have considered all the matters presented by the assignments of error and all the contentions of appellants and in our view the judgment is without error.

Judgment affirmed,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appeal by certain objectors from a judgment of the district court of Ramsey county confirming assessments for street improvements. The ease was here on appeal from an order denying their motion for a new trial and is reported in 164 Minn. 31, 204 N. W. 558.

So far as the questions now presented were before the court on the former appeal from the order denying a new trial, the decision on that appeal is the law of the case. There is no call for reconsideration. The appellants refer to a few matters which were not specifically discussed in the former opinion though they were not overlooked. We have considered all the matters presented by the assignments of error and all the contentions of appellants and in our view the judgment is without error.

Judgment affirmed,

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

209 N.W. 632, 167 Minn. 525, 1926 Minn. LEXIS 1377, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-assessment-of-benefits-from-changing-grade-grading-paving-minn-1926.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack