In re Assessment of Benefits from Changing Grade, Grading, Paving & Improving of Robert

209 N.W. 632, 167 Minn. 525, 1926 Minn. LEXIS 1377
Supreme Court of Minnesota·Decided June 11, 1926·No. No. 26,225·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appeal by certain objectors from a judgment of the district court of Ramsey county confirming assessments for street improvements. The ease was here on appeal from an order denying their motion for a new trial and is reported in 164 Minn. 31, 204 N. W. 558.

So far as the questions now presented were before the court on the former appeal from the order denying a new trial, the decision on that appeal is the law of the case. There is no call for reconsideration. The appellants refer to a few matters which were not specifically discussed in the former opinion though they were not overlooked. We have considered all the matters presented by the assignments of error and all the contentions of appellants and in our view the judgment is without error.

Judgment affirmed,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Assessment of Benefits from Changing Grade, Grading, Paving & Improving of Robert, 209 N.W. 632, 167 Minn. 525, 1926 Minn. LEXIS 1377 (Mich. 1926).

209 N.W. 632 (In re Assessment of Benefits from Changing Grade, Grading, Paving & Improving of Robert) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Bentley
45 N.W.2d 185 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1950)