In Re Armstrong World Industries, Inc.

348 B.R. 136, 2006 Bankr. LEXIS 2914, 2006 WL 2506331
District Court, D. Delaware·Decided August 18, 2006·No. 00-4471 (JKF)·Published·Cited by 15 cases

Opinion

FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW REGARDING CONFIRMATION OF THE FOURTH AMENDED PLAN OF REORGANIZATION OF ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC., AS MODIFIED

EDUARDO C. ROBRENO, District Judge.

Armstrong World Industries, Inc. (“AWI ”), as debtor and debtor in possession (the “Debtor”), having proposed and filed the Fourth Amended Plan of Reorganization of Armstrong World Industries, Inc., dated May 23, 2003 (as modified by the modifications filed on October 17, 2003, November 10, 2003 and December 3, 2004 (collectively, the “Modifications”) the “Plan”), 1 and the Disclosure Statement in respect of the Fourth Amended Plan, dated June 2, 2003 (the “Disclosure Statement”); and the procedures for solicitation and tabulation of votes to accept or reject the Plan having been approved by the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware (the “Bankruptcy Court”) pursuant to an order dated April 21, 2003 (the “Voting Procedures Order*’); and the Disclosure Statement having been approved by the Bankruptcy Court pursuant to an order dated June 4, 2003, as containing “adequate information” pursuant to section 1125 of the Bankruptcy Code (the “Disclosure Statement Order*’); and the Affidavit of Trumbull Associates LLC (f.k.a. Trumbull Services, LLC) (“Trumbull”) Regarding Service by First Class Mail of the Solicitation Materials Related to the Plan Pursuant to the Disclosure Statement Order, dated July 1, 2003 (the “Trumbull Affidavit of Mailing”), having been filed with the Bankrupt *140 cy Court, and the Affidavit of Service of Voting Documents by Innisfree M & A Incorporated (“Innisfree”), dated June 25, 2003 (the “Innisfree Affidavit of Mailing” and, together with the Trumbull Affidavit of Mailing, the “Affidavits of Mailing”), having been filed with the Bankruptcy Court; and the certificate of publications of Kathy Kinsella of Kinsella Communications, Ltd. (the “Certificate of Publications”) attesting to the publication of the Confirmation Hearing Publication Notice and the Asbestos Publication Notice (as hereinafter defined) in accordance with the Voting Procedures Order having been filed with the Bankruptcy Court; and the Certification of Votes Tabulated by Trumbull (the “Trumbull Codification”) and the Certification of Votes Tabulated by Innis-free (the “Innisfree Certification” and, together with the Trumbull Certification, the “Certifications of Votes”) having been filed with the Bankruptcy Court on November 7, 2003; and AWI having filed with the Bankruptcy Court the affidavits in support of confirmation of the Plan of (i) William C. Rodruan, Vice President and Controller of AWI (the “Rodruan Affidavit”), (ii) Daniel L. Aronson, a Director of Lazard Fréres & Co. LLC, (“Lazard”), financial advisors to AWI (the “Aronson Affidavit”), and (iii) Dean M. Trafelet, the Future Claimants’ Representative (the “Trafelet Affidavit” and, together with the Rodruan Affidavit and the Aronson Affidavit, the “Affidavits in Support of Plan Confirmation”) (collectively, with the Affidavits of Mailing, the Certificate of Publications, and the Certifications of Votes, “AWI’s Confirmation Documents”); and each of the Objections (as hereinafter defined) other than the objection of the Unsecured Creditors’ Committee (as hereinafter defined), dated November 12, 2003, having been resolved, overruled or withdrawn pri- or to the hearing to consider confirmation of the Plan conducted by the Bankruptcy Court on November 17 and 18, 2003 (the “Initial Confirmation Hearing”); and, on December 19, 2003, the Bankruptcy Court having entered the Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law Regarding Confirmation of the Fourth Amended Plan of Reorganization of Armstrong World Industries, Inc., as Modified (the “Proposed Findings and Conclusions”) and the Proposed Order Confirming the Fourth Amended Plan of Reorganization of Armstrong World Industries, Inc., as Modified (the “Proposed Confirmation Order”); and on December 29, 2003, the Unsecured Creditors’ Committee having filed an objection to the Proposed Findings and Conclusions (the “Unsecured Creditors’ Committee’s Objection”) with the United States District Court for the District of Delaware (the “District Court”); and the District Court having conducted a hearing to consider the Unsecured Creditors’ Committee’s Objection on December 15, 2004; and on February 23, 2005, the District Court having issued a memorandum decision and order (the “District Court OrdeP’) denying confirmation of the Plan; and on March 4, 2005, AWI having filed a notice of appeal from the District Court Order with the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit (the “Third Circuit Appeal”); and on December 29, 2005, the Third Circuit having issued an opinion affirming the District Court Order; and on February 8, 2006, the District Court having entered the Order (the “Case Management Order”) Establishing Schedule with Respect to Hearing on Confirmation of the Fourth Amended Plan of Reorganization of Armstrong World Industries, Inc., as Modified; and pursuant to the Case Management Order, on February 21, 2006, AWI having filed the Fourth Amended Plan of Reorganization of Armstrong World Industries, Inc., as Modified (the “Modified Plan”); and the District Court having conducted a *141 hearing to consider confirmation of the Modified Plan on May 23, 24, 25, and July 11, 2006 (the “Confirmation Hearing”); and the District Court having reviewed and considered the Modified Plan, the Exhibit Volume filed with the Bankruptcy Court on September 5, 2003 (as modified and as may be modified from time to time, the “Exhibit Volume”), AWPs Confirmation Documents, the Disclosure Statement, the Disclosure Statement Order, and the entire record of the Initial Confirmation Hearing and the Confirmation Hearing, and the District Court being familiar with the Modified Plan and other relevant factors affecting AWI’s chapter 11 case (the “Chapter 11 Case”); and the District Court having taken judicial notice of the entire record of the Chapter 11 Case since the Commencement Date; and the appearance of all interested parties having been duly noted in the record of the Confirmation Hearing; and the District Court having entered its decision and order, dated August 14, 2006 (the “Unfair Discrimination Decision and Order”), overruling the Unfair Discrimination Objection (as hereinafter defined); and after due deliberation and sufficient cause appearing therefor;

IT IS HEREBY FOUND, CONCLUDED, AND ADJUDGED, AS FOLLOWS:

FINDINGS OF FACT

Prepetition Asbestos-Related Personal Injury Litigation Against AWI

1.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Re Armstrong World Industries, Inc., 348 B.R. 136, 2006 Bankr. LEXIS 2914, 2006 WL 2506331 (D. Del. 2006).

348 B.R. 136 (In Re Armstrong World Industries, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re: Mallinckrodt, plc
D. Delaware, 2022
RTI Holding Company, LLC
D. Delaware, 2021
Humana, Inc. v. Shrader & Assocs., LLP
584 B.R. 658 (S.D. Texas, 2018)
In re G-I Holdings, Inc.
568 B.R. 731 (D. New Jersey, 2017)
In re Health Diagnostic Laboratory, Inc.
551 B.R. 218 (E.D. Virginia, 2016)
In re Hyatt
509 B.R. 707 (D. New Mexico, 2014)
In re Physiotherapy Holdings, Inc.
506 B.R. 619 (D. Delaware, 2014)
In Re W.R. Grace & Co.
729 F.3d 311 (Third Circuit, 2013)
Bank of New York v. Becker (In re Lower Bucks Hospital)
488 B.R. 303 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 2013)
In re Tribune Co.
476 B.R. 843 (D. Delaware, 2012)
In re W.R. Grace & Co.
475 B.R. 34 (D. Delaware, 2012)
In Re Quigley Co., Inc.
437 B.R. 102 (S.D. New York, 2010)